How could juries be helped?

[ Under construction ]

I was thinking of some measures that might possibly help juries to reach correct decisions in complex cases.

One aspect that I believe is unfair is the prosecution may never actually ever disclose it’s theory ( or theories ), possibly introducing a new theory after the defence have concluded their closing argument.

And then perhaps to help the jury, there could be a collection of facts that are not in dispute, clearly laid out to help them understand the evidence.

Why do juries sometimes go so badly wrong? I think it certainly is related to emotional arguments.

[ Need to talk about the scientific method, and how you must form a hypothesis before testing it ]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s