Jodi Arias – the pre-trial hearing on October 16

It seems to me there is reason to believe Jodi did forge the ten letters excluded from evidence.
The defense state they are not going to rely on the letters in any way, but Juan wanted to bring them in, and to have testimony that there was evidence of Jodi practising TA’s handwriting.
Kirk mentions “collateral estoppel” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_estoppel.
 
Kirk also mentions Juan asking defense witnesses hypothetical questions about the letters in interviews.
 
If Jodi forged the letters, this could be one reason Kirk didn’t like Jodi 9 days out of 10!
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Jodi Arias – the pre-trial hearing on October 16”

  1. “It seems to me there is reason to believe Jodi did forge the ten letters excluded from evidence.”

    I think so, too. But I’m interested in hearing WHY you think she (or a friend/supporter) may have forged the letters. Aside from their obvious mitigation value. I’m asking why would she would forge a letter in which Alexander confesses to actual sex crimes against boys? I have my own ideas, but I’m interested in what another Arias sympathizer thinks about this.

    1. Well it would be corroboration. But after more thought, I don’t believe the letters were forged. However there is much stronger evidence that Jodi is innocent, so it’s better to concentrate on that!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s