Category Archives: Reform

My thoughts on reform

Some thoughts on how to reform the criminal justice system in the USA.

1. Eliminate the death penalty and very long sentences.

A culture of excessive sentencing has built up over a period of the last few decades, doubtless fuelled by public anger about crime.

I believe

(a) Nobody should be sentenced to more than 20 years before parole is considered.

(b) For people who maintain their innocence, this should not be a barrier to release.

(c) Behaviour while in prison should be the main factor in determining whether an offender may be safely released.

(d) Monitoring technology should be used for those who are released on probation. Sex offenders should be offered treatment and/or technology to assist them with not re-offending, as a condition for release.

There are multiple reasons for eliminating excessively harsh sentences.

(a) Very few people will be the same criminal that they were after serving a 10 or 20 year sentence, especially if they are young when convicted. Most people do deserve a second chance.

(b) Excessively harsh sentences do not deter crime, and can provoke it. Excluding wrongful convictions, no prisoner should feel their sentence is unjust.

(c) It is unfair to those who are wrongly convicted – and this will always be a possibility.

(d) Incarceration rates are currently excessive.

2. Educate police, prosecutors and juries on wrongful convictions, and the real danger of convicting someone on weak evidence. Ensure that expert testimony is based on proven science. Jurors should be cautioned NOT to attempt to function as unreliable “human lie detectors”, instead they should focus on the content of witness testimony.

3. Criminal trials should be kept short. If the prosecution has credible evidence, it should be able to make it’s case in two or three days of testimony at most, and very lengthy cross-examination of defendants and defense witnesses should not be allowed.

4. Experts should be required to prepare reports for the jury, and these reports should be subject to anonymous peer-review. Defense attorneys should be able to flag reports for peer review, pre-trial.

The investigation should be DOCUMENTED. That means recording everything  that can be recorded with photographs and videos, especially ALL interviews, the crime scene and the autopsy.

5. Prosecutors should not be allowed to inflame juries, the only task for a jury should be to determine facts.

6. The jury should be given a written summary of the evidence by the judge before considering their verdict.

7. The jury should be required to give a written summary of their reasoning when they return their verdict. They should specify any evidence about which they have doubts, especially if further investigation or information could resolve those doubts.  If necessary the trial should be adjourned to allow such investigations to be completed.

8. Sentencing should be done by judges not juries.

9. Defendants of good character who are convicted on uncertain evidence should be given early parole.

10. Misconduct is a serious issue. I believe absolute immunity for prosecutors from wrongdoing should be removed, and all information and evidence held by the State should be disclosed to defense attorneys. In addition law enforcement ( police, prosecutors and judges ) should NOT be directly elected, as politics and justice do not mix well.

11. The appellate system needs to be functional – to actually right wrongs, ensure that convictions are SAFE – and not just procedurally correct. The standard for appeal should be whether the prosecution case really was objectively proved beyond a reasonable doubt, not simply that the jury returned a guilty verdict.

Discussion Here.


“Decades ago, the UK encountered a similar roadblock to fair policing. A national law, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984 [PACE], however, subsequently required officers to videotape their interviews, among other provisions.” see A recurring problem in ‘Making A Murderer’ used to be huge in the UK — and the country figured out how to fix it


Should police interviews with witnesses be recorded by default?

In the same way that suspect interviews are now almost universally recorded, I believe that all interviews with witnesses (including lineups) should also be recorded, unless the witness specifically asks otherwise when informed that they are being recorded.

I believe this would reduce the chance of witnesses being persuaded to give false testimony, and make for fairer trials.


Sharing Views on Prosecutorial Reform

Well said.

I wish that conventional media would also play a more active role, acting more decisively and with less timidity to expose corrupt prosecutors.

Finally I do think Social Media may have a role to play here. It may be that prosecutors become aware that there is oversight by “the people” that they cannot safely ignore.

Wrongful Convictions Blog

If you’ve read much of my stuff on this blog, you must know that prosecutors, as a group, are not my favorite people. I am a person driven by logic, fairness, reason, and justice. Given their position, I would expect prosecutors to be the same. After all, they’re supposed to be “ministers of justice,” but my observation is that’s so often not the case. I will grant that because of the work that I do, I routinely have exposure to prosecutorial behavior that is less than ethical, is not in the interest of true justice, and is sometimes just criminal. And because they’re “prosecutors,” they get away with it. I do not believe that prosecutors are inherently evil and unethical people; but they are human beings, subject to all the same human frailties that we all are. In fact, I believe their behavior, given the incentives built into the…

View original post 1,646 more words

A Major Cause of Wrongful Convictions …….. POLITICS !?

I could not agree more. The cult of personality should be anathema to justice, and having elected prosecutors ( and judges ) is inviting that. In the UK, we have an attorney general who supervises the crown prosecution service. The attorney general answers to parliament, and his is not a political position.

Wrongful Convictions Blog

[Editor’s note: this piece has been very difficult to write.  I’ve been working on it for months, and have deliberated about publishing it at all; I think because the objective it advocates is so daunting.  But I do think it goes to the heart of so much that is wrong with the justice system. I do not have hard data to support my position, and I doubt such data will ever exist, but I do have decades of study and careful observation.  I only report what I observe. Please read it, and just think about it.]

This article will be both editorial and somewhat philosophical, at least to the extent that it expresses conclusions on my part, so please bear with me. But it does address an issue that I believe is one of the key flaws in the justice system – and one that seems to be universally overlooked…

View original post 1,466 more words